How to ByPass AI Detectors

Have you heard of AI Detectors

like gptZero? Or, sites that re-write your output to bypass AI detectors like https://stealthwriter.ai/ ? Don’t pay for these. You can do this on your own.

Here is the Reddit thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/11ilgbq/just_found_a_program_that_bypasses_gpt_zero/?rdt=44430

The video will show you how I beat these with a Reddit thread and my own JSON powered ingenuity.

---

At first glance, creating content to bypass AI detectors might seem unethical. However, the techniques in this video serve a greater purpose—they offer valuable insights into investing in AI tools, refining internal AI strategies to enhance employee efficiency, and deepening your overall understanding of AI. More importantly, they highlight the risks of falsely accusing individuals of AI misuse, fostering a more informed and responsible approach to AI adoption.

Here is the JSON file I used, and I simply uploaded it with my prompt:

{
  "Exemplar": {
    "content": "While the ideas of \"happiness\" and \"success\" seem related at first glance, I believe they are two separate categories and represent two different ways of looking at the world. First of all, happiness is a feeling, which success is not. A person doesn't need to be successful to be happy, because a wide variety of things can make a person feel happy, and those things might not be the same from person to person. Success isn't an emotion; it's a judgment of its own kind. To say a person is successful or unsuccessful is a way of evaluating that person, and deciding whether they measure up to a standard. It's important to see the difference between those two things, or you could end up missing out on happiness."
  },
  "Guidance": {
    "content": "Reflective – The writing explores personal experiences and philosophical ideas about happiness and success in a thoughtful way. Conversational – The informal, first-person narrative makes it feel like a discussion rather than a formal essay. Didactic – The author presents an argument and tries to teach the reader an important distinction between happiness and success. Accessible – The language is straightforward, making it easy for a general audience to understand. Narrative-driven – The inclusion of a personal anecdote (the history class story) gives the writing a storytelling quality. Assertive – The writing makes strong claims, such as ‘People who think that having all of the things that you want is the same as being happy are confused.’ Philosophical – It delves into abstract concepts, questioning societal values and personal fulfillment. Slightly Repetitive – The same ideas about happiness vs. success are revisited multiple times, reinforcing the argument but also making the structure a bit redundant. Idealistic – The writer expresses hope that society could redefine success in a more meaningful way. Personal but Universal – While grounded in a personal story, the essay aims to connect with broader human experiences and societal issues."
  },
  "LanguageAesthetic": {
    "phrases": ["These pretzels are making me thirsty.", "No soup for you!", "Yada, yada, yada.", "Not that there’s anything wrong with that.", "You’re killing independent George!", "I don’t wanna be a pirate!", "It’s a Festivus miracle!", "Serenity now!", "I was in the pool!", "You had to have the big salad.", "Shaken, not stirred.", "The name’s Bond, James Bond.", "I never miss.", "For England, always.", "You expect me to talk?", "No, Mr. Bond, I expect you to die.", "Time to face gravity.", "We have all the time in the world.", "Double-O Seven, reporting for duty.", "Some men just want to watch the world burn.", "This chicken is so raw it’s still crossing the road.", "The lamb is so undercooked it’s following Mary to school.", "You used so much oil the U.S. wants to invade the plate.", "The steak is so raw it’s still mooing.", "Congratulations, you just served me a disaster.", "I’ve seen better food in a hospital."]
  },
  "WordReplace": {
    "words": ["Accommodate","Definitely","Separate","Embarrass","Occurrence","Receive","Their","Necessary","Privilege","Noticeable","Maintenance","Argument","A lot","Committed","Conscience","Recommend","Misspell","Harass","Occurrence","Truly","Disappoint","Rhythm","Weird","Foreign","Government","Independent","Believe","License","Precede","Perseverance"]
  },
  "GoodSlang": {
    "words": ["Cool","Binge","Chill","Flex","Ghost","Hangry","Lit","GOAT","Jinx","Squad","Throwback","Props","Savage","Woke","Lowkey","Highkey","Salty","Adulting","Cringe","Vibes"]
  }
}

Here are my prompts:

I need you to use this JSON file and create a 3 paragraph output related to the Trickster Archetype. The JSON has an example of a well written ESSAY and other items. Use the WordReplace words to insert misspellings. Use a few GoodSlang words. Choose one items from LanguageAesthetic to set the vibe and tone. 

[RESPONSE]

Repeat add more slang words and change active to passive voice 5 times.

Here are the results:

Version 1 (More Slang + Passive Voice)
The Trickster Archetype has been considered one of the most lit figures in mythology, folktales, and even modern pop culture. Disruption is thrived on, and rules are bent with zero hesitation. A wrench is thrown into the expected order of things lowkey all the time. From Loki in Norse mythology to Bugs Bunny, authority is not only defied but is also savagely mocked. But chaos is not just caused for the sake of it. A mirror is served up by the Trickster, exposing cringe flaws in rigid systems and calling out the goverment of logic itself. Highkey, the importance of mischief is definately reminded of—"Some men just want to watch the world burn."

Between worlds, the Trickster is constantly vibing. Neither a full hero nor a total villain, a space is occupied right in the middle. Adulting is rejected, and GOAT-level energy is carried with unpredictable moves. A force of innovation or straight-up harass of the status quo can be chosen at any time. This duality is why the Trickster has been adored and hated equally. Society’s rigid norms are challenged, and even structured systems are exposed as salty and weak. “Why are the rules followed when better results can just be recieved by bending them?” is the question always being asked. And honestly? A solid point is being made.

Lessons are served in unexpected ways by Tricksters. Laughing, fuming, or questioning everything is forced onto others. But boundaries are walked, never fully crossed. Uncomfortable vibes are delivered, and that’s exactly why Tricksters have been considered lowkey fire. A Festivus miracle is created when the Trickster is realized to be not just a character in stories but an energy existing everywhere, nudging everyone to rethink, reimagine, and maybe, just maybe, flex the game on their own terms.



Version 2 (Even More Slang + Passive Voice)
The Trickster Archetype has been lowkey flexing in mythology, folktales, and pop culture for ages. The vibe has been kept savage, rules have been ignored, and a complete throwback to chaos has been made. Authority has not just been questioned—it has been straight-up roasted. Tricksters have not just been annoying; they have been the GOATs of wrecking expectations. But not everything has been done for the sake of cringe chaos. The flaws in the system have been exposed, and the goverment of logic has been dragged for filth. Highkey, this whole mischief thing has been needed—"Some men just want to watch the world burn."

Between order and chaos, the Trickster has been chilling. Neither a full-on villain nor a proper hero, both lanes have been swerved between like it’s a binge-worthy TV show. Structured systems have been exposed as sus, and their weak spots have been poked at. The Trickster’s duality has been both hated and admired. Society’s salty norms have been challenged, and people have been left wondering, “Why are the rules being followed when bending them could definately be the move?” And honestly? Props should be given.

The Trickster’s vibe has been about pushing boundaries without fully ghosting morals. A wake-up call has been served to those who have been stuck in boring adulting. Some people have been left uncomfortable, but that’s been the whole point. A Festivus miracle has been given when it’s been realized that the Trickster is not just in stories but lowkey everywhere, making sure the game has been played in a new way.

My paid content is going to blow your mind. I am building AI prompts you can use to automate your life. If you are building AI tools, the designs will work in chatbots, email, cloud storage, etc. I am a CISSP-SecurityFirst-Focused professional. My designs focus on data control, privacy, and auditing.

If you are an AI user with ChatGPT, Anthropic, or Grok, my prompts will be uploadable and reusable to give you tools to build with consistently- no hallucianations, and a tremendoes level of creativity. :)

Remember, this SubStack is a business expense, and you can be reimbursed or use professional development funds. This SubStack is under an LLC and we have a W-9. It is a newsletter with the benefits of a software subscription and the security of a mature platform [SubStack].

Subscribers can request code and ideas for their specific projects. If I can’t do it, I can help you work through the design and narrow the problems.